News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Bypass changes direction 

Bypass changes direction

08 Feb, 2012 07:44 AM
HEATED debate over the future of a Berry bypass has taken an unexpected twist with Roads and Maritime Services (formerly the RTA) investigating a new southern route put forward by engineer Bruce Ramsay, who was responsible for changes to the planned northern route.

Mr Ramsay, who retired to the Shoalhaven after running major construction companies around the world, drew up amendments to the planned northern bypass route on behalf of the organisation Better Options for Berry.

However when the changes were presented to a fiery public meeting in Berry during December he became aware of the possibility of a bypass route to the south of Berry that he did not believe had been properly investigated.

He has drawn up a plan for a southern bypass that “resolves about 95 per cent of the problems with the northern option”, and which he said was a genuine bypass that would preserve Berry’s integrity and character for the next 100 years.

Topping the list of concerns about the northern bypass route that had already been accepted was the way it cut Berry in half, separating the town’s existing 460 homes from another 540 planned for the Huntingdale Park estate and Graham Park.

The Kangaroo Valley Road interchange, the North Street alignment and the bypass’s impact on Victoria Street were other major concerns expressed by Berry residents, which Mr Ramsay said were all solved through the southern route.

“It’s just a no-brainer,” he said, adding he could not understand why a bypass to the south of Berry had not previously been thoroughly investigated.

“I’ve asked the questions, but I never get an answer to them,” he said.

“This is well away from the town, people are not affected by it, it is a true bypass.

“Most importantly, this will preserve Berry for ever and a day,” Mr Ramsay said.

Roads and Maritime Services is seriously considering Mr Ramsay’s southern route, with several meetings having already taken place and costings in the process of being prepared.

“It’s very well advanced, I expect a decision before Easter,” Mr Ramsay said.

He predicted the cost of the southern bypass would be the same or less than the northern option.

His route leaves the Princes Highway at Croziers Road south of Berry, and heads across farmland before reconnecting with the existing highway near the statues of Alexander and David Berry.

Mr Ramsay said the road, built at a level to ensure it would not flood, would include bridges, viaducts and culverts under which farm machinery and livestock could pass.

During the process of planning the bypass the RTA considered several routes south of Berry but ruled them out because of cost, flooding and environmental issues.

Mr Ramsay said the environmental concerns were centred on acid sulphate soils, but added there were standard engineering practices used all over Australia for dealing with the potentially polluting soils.

The new southern route is being pushed by Kiama MP Gareth Ward who said he had asked the Roads Minister to review previous costings “following representations from local residents who have significant civil engineering experience”.

“This decision to review a southern bypass will not stop progress of this project; however I have an obligation as the local Member to ask all necessary and relevant questions to get the best possible outcome for Berry,” Mr Ward said.

A Roads and Maritime Services spokesperson confirmed a new look at a southern route would not delay development of a Berry bypass, as the southern route would be reviewed concurrently with work on the approved northern bypass.

She said the authority would report back to the community on possible costs, noise, visual impact, social and environmental issues about Easter.

Shoalhaven deputy mayor, coucillor Andrew Guile said it has real benefits for Berry residents that include pedestrian safety, preservation of quality of life with less noise as well as the removal of any interruption of Berry’s visual connection with the escarpment.

However the move has provoked new anger among the Berry community.

Resident Russell Baldwin said he was “stunned” the issue was being dredged up again when it seemed to have been resolved.

“I thought this was all put to bed and decided,” he said.

“I’m amazed this can surface now and possibly change the shape of the project.

“This will just put the community in uproar again,” he said, predicting protests from people living in Berry’s south.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I've got a great idea,lets also build it beside the rail line to the North.But really,are these people (RTA) just trying to keep themselves in a job?
Posted by E.J., 8/02/2012 8:56:51 AM, on South Coast Register
My opinion is that the route should follow the rail line. Less distance, more straight, less earthworks (so much cutting) and less issues. This would reduce scale of construction and ultimately fuel consumption vehicles using the highway.


Posted by SA, 8/02/2012 8:41:59 PM, on South Coast Register
Personally I don't care which side they build it on as LONG AS THEY BUILD IT! And as soon as possible - lets not spend decades arguing about it or the frogs or rare fairies at the bottom of the garden - lets just get Berry bypassed!
Posted by whoami, 8/02/2012 9:00:02 PM, on South Coast Register
"Roads and Martime Service" why not make a canal? Get on with it!
Posted by Brett, 9/02/2012 9:03:54 AM, on South Coast Register
just build the damn thing, bypass Berry properly and constructively, with out offending those easly offended and without the native hiatus, please...
Posted by Nowra Cynic, 9/02/2012 10:45:10 AM, on South Coast Register
You all realise, don't you, that this will NEVER happen. I'm sure there will be some green winged flying octopus living in a fallen tree somewhere along the planned route!
Posted by Logically Yours, 9/02/2012 3:25:43 PM, on South Coast Register
This is outrageous. Farms have been bought, people displaced, Berry townspeople have sold and re -bought based on the release of the northern bypass info. How can the RTA even consider changing their minds at the eleventh hour? It is criminal. I would say this is simply certain members of the community trying to save their arses and push the problem elsewhere.
Posted by outraged, 9/02/2012 9:14:52 PM, on South Coast Register
this bypass has been goin on north street for 40 years why change it the people on north street that have moved in have known this fact why change it its all the bloody idiots in berry that are cuasing the problems and the other absolute birdbrain gareth ward whoever voted that complete utter fool into parliament needs a good wake up call he jumps on any bandwagon he can find. IF YOU DONT LIKE THE BLOODY ROUTE ITS GOING ON PACK UP AND GET OUT OF TOWN YOU IDIOTS YOU ARE THE ONES STOPPING IT FROM BEING BUILT. IF YOU BUILT IT ALONG THE RAIL LINE IT WOULD COST TRIPLE WHAT IT IS COSTING
Posted by born in berry, 9/02/2012 10:13:47 PM, on South Coast Register

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
DRAWING BOARD: Engineer Bruce Ramsay explains the details and benefits of plans he has drawn up for a southern bypass of Berry.
DRAWING BOARD: Engineer Bruce Ramsay explains the details and benefits of plans he has drawn up for a southern bypass of Berry.

Most popular articles

TSR

Domain_realview


South Coast Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...